Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating - Badge
BBB Accredited Business - Badge
Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb -  Top Attorney Personal Injury - Badge
Avvo Clients Choice 2013 - Personal Injury - Badge
Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys - Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association 1911 - Badge
Best Workers Compensation Expertise - Badge

What percentage must a work injury contribute to establish a “compensable” injury under the Massachusetts Workers’ Comp Act?

Troupe Law Office

Recently, the DIA Reviewing Board in Boston addressed in a recent opinion what percentage a work injury must contribute to establish a “compensable injury” under the Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Act, where multiple, non-work-related factors are present.

In this most recent case, Jane Sullivan v. Centrus Premier Home Care, the Insurer appealed the decision of the Administrative Judge after Hearing. One of the points raised on appeal was that the requirements set for in Chapter 152 § 1(7A) were not met with respect to disability after 9/23/09, which was the date of the § 11A Impartial examination. Section 1(7A) states, in part, that where a work injury combines with a pre-existing condition, not compensable under the MA Workers’ Comp Act, the resultant condition shall only be compensable to the extent that the compensable/work-related injury remains “a major, but not necessarily predominant cause of disability and need for treatment.”

In laymen’s terms, § 1(7A) states that where a work injury combines with a pre-existing, non-work-related injury, you must show that the work injury remains “a major, but not necessarily predominant cause” of the resultant condition. The phrase “a major, but not necessarily predominant,” has thus become subject to extensive interpretation by the Judges at the DIA, as well as the Reviewing Board.

So, the question becomes, what constitutes “a major cause?” While every case is unique and presents an almost endless array of possibilities of interpretation, the Reviewing Board, in the present case, gives a nice summary of the well established case law pertaining to this question.

In the present case, Dr. Anas, the Board Impartial physician opined that the employee’s disability was 50% related to her underlying, pre-existing, non-work-related conditions, and the remaining 50% was attributable to her injury at work. So does a work injury which contributes only 50% to a resultant disability rise above the standard set forth in §1(7A)? Here, the Reviewing Board ruled that 50% does, in fact, satisfy the “a major” requirement of § 1(7A). Citing Goodwin’s Case, 82 Mass.App.Ct., 642 (2012), which stated that “a major cause need not be more than fifty percent.” (internal citations omitted).

Going further, they also cite a number of other cases. Durfee v. Baldwin Crain and Equip, 20 Mass. Workers’ Comp., Rep. 163 (2006), states, “In fact, a smaller percentage is capable of satisfying the “a major” standard.” Lesione v. Corcoran Mgt. Co., 22 Mass. Workers’ Comp. Rep. 153 (2008), states that “medical opinion that work injury was forty percent of cause satisfied” the 1(7A) standard. Finally, Abad v. Stacy’s PITA Chips Co., 25 Mass Workers’ Comp. Rep. 173 (2011), “in the proper circumstances a twenty percent contribution of a work injury to the disabling condition could satisfy the “a major” standard.”

As mentioned above, every case presents a unique set of facts and every case will likely give rise to their own unique interpretation of the 1(7A) standard. However, this case gives a good summary of some significant prior decisions in making the determination of what percentage a work injury must contribute to an underlying disability, in order to get beyond the 1(7A) standard.

Pre-existing conditions play a role in a large portion of the cases we, at the Troupe Law Office, handle on a daily basis. If you have sustained an injury at work, of any kind, it is crucial that you speak with an experienced workers’ compensation attorney as soon as possible. Please visit our web site at https://www.troupelawoffice.com for more information. Or, call us at (978) 531-7401, or email at atroupe@mac.com. We offer free consultations for all cases. We look forward to working with you.

Recent Posts

How Does A Workers Comp Lawyer Get Paid? How Does A Workers Comp Lawyer Get Paid? This is one of the most frequently asked questions posed on the internet regarding workers compensation...

How Does Medical Treatment Get Approved Through The Workers’ Comp System? How Does Medical Treatment Get Approved Through The Workers’ Comp System? This is a highly complicated question with no simple answers, and...

Do I Need A Lawyer To Settle A Workers Comp Claim? Do I Need A Lawyer To Settle A Workers Comp Claim? The short answer is Yes.  That is, if you want to ensure that your rights are adequately...

Client Reviews

Adam and Bill helped me achieve wonderful results of my workers compensation and my accidental disability retirement cases. This was a very complex matter which they handled superbly. Highly recommended attorneys for any workers comp or disability related case.

Mike C.

My overall experience with him was excellent. His overall communication was impeccable especially his ability to explain the law to someone not familiar with legal issues. He always had/made time to pick up the phone. No question was ever too small or insignificant.


In 1992 I was severely injured in a work related accident. It was apparent that my recovery would take years and I needed someone on my side to deal with the insurance company. Attorney Troupe made sure that the Insurance company lived up to their obligations and allowed me to focus on my recovery...


Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 No Fee Unless You Win
  3. 3 Will Travel to You

Fill out the contact form or call us at (978) 531-7401 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message